Haveri, Karnataka - Solar Pumps Tool Haveri, Karnataka | Solar Pumps Tool Humane ClubMade in Humane Club

Haveri, Karnataka

Overall, water availability for irrigation in the district (based on ground water development and long-term trends of water level decline) is within the safe limit, enhancing long-term sustainability of solar pumps. For average crop revenue per holding, the district appears among the top 25 percentile of districts, implying higher investment capacity of the farmers here. The number of medium and long-term institutional loans disbursed in the district is comparatively large, suggesting the availability of credit amongst farmers for potential investments. The district appears in the group of districts, which show (very) low vulnerability towards climate change, as per an index constructed by CRIDA.

Deployment Approaches

Approaches Feasibility
Individually owned off-grid solar pumps Limited Suitability
Solarisation of feeders Limited Suitability
Solar based water as a service Limited Suitability
Promote 1 HP and sub-HP pumps Limited Suitability
Solarisation of individual grid-connected pumps Limited suitability

Individually owned off-grid solar pumps

Limited Suitability

The district has ground water available within the safe limit, high crop revenue per holding, and a relatively high disbursement of institutional credit, but has a comparatively low concentration of diesel pump users, indicating potentially low demand for the private ownership of solar pumps.

Parameter Value Percentile
Number of cultivators reporting use of diesel pumps 483 16
Water Availability Index 0.78 66
Crop revenue per holding (INR) 264,300 90
Medium and long term institutional credit disbursed in a year (in INR Crore) 55.4 59

Solarisation of feeders

Limited Suitability

The district has a relatively high penetration of electric pumps and a comparatively high extent of feeder segregation but its DISCOM incurs a relatively low cost for supplying power. As the power purchase rate of the DISCOM increases going forward, solarisation of the feeders may become economically viable in the district.

Parameter Value Percentile
Actual cost of power supply (INR/kWh) 5.94 41
Extent of feeder segregation 89% 59
Proportion of cultivators reporting use of electric pumps 23% 72

Solar based water as a service

Limited Suitability

Groundwater availability is within the safe limit in this district and the proportion of unirrigated area is high. However, a comparatively low concentration of small and marginal farmers indicates low demand for water as a service.

Parameter Value Percentile
Water Availability Index 0.78 66
Proportion of small and marginal cultivators 73% 28
Unirrigated net sown area as a share of total net sown area 71% 62

Promote 1 HP and sub-HP pumps

Limited Suitability

The district has groundwater availability within safe limit and a relatively high proportion of horticulture crops under gross cropped area. But, a rather low concentration of marginal farmers, and a comparatively low disbursement of institutional credit to them make it difficult to promote 1 HP and sub-HP pumps here.

Parameter Value Percentile
Area under horticulture crops as a share of gross cropped area 9% 61
Water Availability Index 0.78 66
Proportion of marginal cultivators 36% 18
Medium and long term institutional credit disbursed in a year (in INR Crore) 55.4 59

Solarisation of individual grid-connected pumps

Limited suitability

The district has a relatively high penetration of electric pumps, ground water available within the safe limits and a comparatively high extent of feeder segregation. But the relatively low power subsidy for agriculural consumers make solarisation of individual grid-connected pumps an inefficient way of enhancing solar pumps in the district.

Parameter Value Percentile
Water Availability Index 0.78 66
Actual cost of power supply (INR/kWh) 5.94 41
Extent of feeder segregation 89% 59

Leveraging Solar Pumps to Promote Policy Objectives

If you are deploying solar pumps in this district then you can further these policy objectives.

Har Khet ko Pani

A relatively high proportion of the net sown area in the district is unirrigated, indicating high irrigation demand. Solar pumps can help improve access to underground irrigation as part of Har Khet ko Pani.

Parameter Value Percentile
Unirrigated net sown area as a share of total net sown area 71% 62

Doubling Farmers’ Income – Crop Intensity

A relatively high proportion of the district’s net sown area is unirrigated. Lack of access to irrigation is one of the major barriers to growing crops beyond two conventional seasons, rabi and kharif. Ensuring irrigation access through solar power will help improve cropping intensity and move towards the aim of doubling farmers’ income by 2022.

Parameter Value Percentile
Unirrigated net sown area as a share of total net sown area 71% 62

Per Drop More Crop

In the district, crops suitable for drip and sprinkler irrigation occupy a relatively high proportion of gross cropped area, making it easy to adopt such high precision irrigation methods. Solar pumps, along with other efficient and precise water application devices, could be deployed under Per Drop More Crop to promote efficient irrigation.

Parameter Value Percentile
Area under crops suitable for drip and sprinkler irrigation as a share of total cropped area 37% 71

Haveri, Karnataka
Summary
Number of operational holdings
217,996
Average size of operational holding (Ha)
1.77
No. of cultivators using diesel pumps
483
No. of cultivators using electric pumps
49,935
Parameters (value, percentile)
Unirrigated net sown area ('000 ha)
261
88
Area under horticulture crops as a share of gross cropped area
9%
61
Water Availability Index
0.78
66
Monthly per capita expenditure of rural agricultural households (INR)
1,351
59
Crop revenue per holding (INR)
264,300
90
No. of rural and semi-urban bank branches per 10,000 farmers
8.53
61
Medium and long-term institutional credit disbursed in a year (in INR Crore)
55.4
59
No. of calls made at Kisan Call Centre (between 1.1.2011 - 31.12.2015)
1,125
45
Level of farm mechanisation (tractors, harvesters, threshers per ha)
0.21
47